IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Google and Overture Services, Inc. (“Overture”). A First Amended Complaint was filed on May 14, 2004, and on November 29, 2004, Overture was dismissed as a defendant. Therefore, all references to the Complaint in this Opinion are to the First Amended Complaint, and only Google remains as a defendant. In a previous Memorandum Opinion discussed more fully below, the Court dismissed Google’s Motion to Dismiss in part, finding that Google did “use” plaintiff’s trademark for purposes of the Lanham Act, although not necessarily improperly. The Court granted defendant’s Motion To Dismiss state law counts of tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and statutory civil business conspiracy and denied the Motion to the extent that it sought a ruling that Google did not “use” plaintiff’s trademark. See Gov’t Employees Ins. Co. v. Google, Inc., 330 F. Supp. 2d 700 (E.D. Va. 2004). IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
منابع مشابه
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Google and Overture Services, Inc. (“Overture”). A First Amended Complaint was filed on May 14, 2004, and on November 29, 2004, Overture was dismissed as a defendant. Therefore, all references to the Complaint in this Opinion are to the First Amended Complaint, and only Google remains as a defendant. In a previous Memorandum Opinion discussed more fully below, the Court dismissed Google’s Motio...
متن کاملIn the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division Bartex
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BARTEX RESEARCH, LLC § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:07-CV-385 § FEDEX CORP., § et al. § ORDER ADOPTING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Memorandum Opinion and Order of the Magistrate Judge (the “Opin...
متن کاملSharlene Abrams United States District Court Northern District of Californi a San Jose Division
Farclla Braan & Martel LLP S . Francisco Douglas R . Young (State Bar No . 073248), dyoung@fbm .com C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No . 121930), [email protected] James C . Mann (State Bar No . 221603) [email protected] Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Defendant SHARLENE ABRAMS UNITED S...
متن کامل